Local excision for T1 rectal tumours: are we getting better?

AIM: The objective was to assess the effect of three different surgical treatments for T1 rectal tumours, radical resection (RR), open local excision (open LE) and laparoscopic local excision (laparoscopic LE), on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Adults from the National Cancer Database (2008-2016) with a diagnosis of T1 rectal cancer were stratified by treatment type (LE vs RR). We assumed that laparoscopic LE equates to transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The primary outcome was 5-year OS. Subgroup analyses of the LE group stratified by time period [2008-2010 (before TAMIS) vs 2011-2016 (after TAMIS)] and approach (laparoscopic vs open) were performed. RESULTS: Among 10 053 patients, 6623 (65.88%) underwent LE (74.33% laparoscopic LE vs 25.67% open LE) and 3430 (34.12%) RR. The use of LE increased from 52.69% in 2008 to 69.47% in 2016, whereas RR decreased (P < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS between the LE and RR groups (P = 0.639) and between the two LE time periods (P = 0.509), which was consistent with the adjusted analysis (LE vs RR, hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.20, P = 0.468; 2008-2010 LE vs 2011-2016 LE, hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.92-1.29, P = 0.321). Laparoscopic LE was associated with improved OS in the unadjusted analysis only (P = 0.006), compared to the open LE group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.12, P = 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of a LE approach for T1 rectal tumours as a strategy to reduce surgical morbidity without compromising survival.

Risk factors for wound complications after abdominoperineal excision: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database.

AIM: The perineal wound following abdominoperineal excision (APR) is associated with a high complication rate. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for wound complications and examine the effect of flap reconstruction on wound healing. METHOD: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was searched for patients who underwent APR for rectal adenocarcinoma. They were divided into two groups: primary closure of the perineal wound and flap reconstruction. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for deep surgical site infection (SSI) and wound dehiscence. RESULTS: A total of 8449 (94%) patients from the database underwent primary closure and 550 (6%) underwent flap reconstruction. Patients who underwent flap reconstruction had a longer operation time, a higher incidence of deep SSI, wound dehiscence, more blood transfusion requirement and a higher rate of return to the operating room (all P < 0.001). Risk factors for deep SSI were African American race (OR 1.5, P = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4 (OR 3.2, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.7, P = 0.006), weight loss (OR 2, P < 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 1.9, P < 0.001). Risk factors for wound dehiscence included ASA classification ≥ 4 (OR 2.2, P = 0.003), history of smoking (OR 2.2, P < 0.001), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.7, P = 0.03), BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.9, P = 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 2.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perineal wound complications are related to a patient's race, ASA classification, smoking, obesity and weight loss. Compared with primary closure, closure with a flap was associated with higher odds of wound infection and dehiscence and was not protective of wound complications in the presence of other risk factors. Therefore optimizing the patient's medical condition will lead to a better outcome irrespective of the technique used for perineal wound closure.

[Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome: A case of hypoxemia associated with a patent foramen ovale]. / Platypnée-orthodéoxie: un cas rare d'hypoxémie secondaire d'une réouverture post-traumatique du foramen ovale perméable.

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome is a rare disease characterized by dyspnea and oxygen desaturation in the upright position with improvement in the supine position. We report a case of an 87-year-old woman with a recent history of traumatic hip, spine deformity and vertebral compression fracture, referred due to dyspnea oxygen desaturation. Thoracic tomodensitometry excluded the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Transthoracic echocardiography, with intravenous administration of agitated saline contrast solution, revealed the presence of atrial septal defect associated with a right to left shunting and mild enlargement of aortic root. Surgical closure of atrial septal defect resulted in resolution of the syndrome.

[Pulmonary hypertension and heart failure: the role of pulmonary vasculature]. / Hypertension pulmonaire et insuffisance cardiaque : le rôle de la vascularisation pulmonaire.

Left heart disease is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension. Increased left-sided filling pressure leads to passive postcapillary venous hypertension. In some patients, pulmonary vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling may lead to a further increase in pulmonary pressure. When precapillary hypertension component is associated to left heart failure, the elevation of pulmonary pressure is out of proportion with left atrial pressure: transpulmonary gradient greater than 12 mmHg (mean pulmonary pressure -- mean capillary pressure) and pulmonary vascular resistance greater than three Wood units. Precapillary pulmonary hypertension is common in severe systolic heart failure. Before cardiac transplantation, increased pulmonary vascular resistance greater than 3,5 Wood units are reported in 19 to 35% of patients. In those patients vasoreactivity tests are performed with inotropic and/or systemic and/or pulmonary agents to determine the risk of right heart failure after transplantation. There is no pulmonary vascular resistance level above which transplantation is contraindicated. Cardiac assistance may be used before and after transplantation when pulmonary hypertension is severe and not reversible with conventional treatment and/or pulmonary vasodilators. The contribution of precapillary PH in diastolic heart failure is not known but can be significant and lead to disproportionate PH particularly in elderly. The precapillary component of pulmonary hypertension could be a therapeutic target for specific pulmonary vasodilators. Until now pharmacological trials has been disappointing and those medications can be dangerous because of increasing blood flow to the pulmonary capillaries with a risk of pulmonary edema when left sided pressure are still elevated.

[Multidetector computed tomography coronarography: from studies to everyday life]. / Le scanner coronaire : des études à la pratique courante.

INTRODUCTION: Multidetector computed tomography coronarography is a promising tool, offering a non-invasive anatomic evaluation of coronary arteries. The great majority of studies conducted upon it are single-center studies, and have reported results based upon a highly selected patient population. Our aim was to determine its diagnostic accuracy among an unselected population in multicenter studies. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were included in a non-randomised, retrospective study. Patients underwent multidetector computed tomography coronarography (16, 40 and 64 slices), in ten different centers (community hospitals or private centres), for clinical suspicion of coronary stenoses. The diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant coronary stenoses (> or =50%) was determined in comparison with conventional coronarography. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy were 91.4%, 17.7%, 69.6%, 50.0%, and 67.3%, respectively, in a patient-based analysis, and 55.3%, 85.6%, 30.3%, 94.4% and 82.5% in a segment-based analysis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that routine implementation of multidetector computed tomography coronarography is limited by a high false-positive rate, when performed among an unselected population of patients with a high pretest probability of having coronary stenoses, in centres with variable expertises. Its place within the range of diagnostic tools has yet to be determined by large multicenter studies, before being subject to precise recommendations framing its routine clinical application.